<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 1 Rankings</title>
	<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-709</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-709</guid>
					<description>TV - For some reason your comment made on Sunday was treated as “spam,” and I didn’t catch it until just now….anyway, as you can see, yes, we will be doing weekly starter advice….While it’s a close call, we suggest going with Antonio Bryant over M. Jones for week 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV - For some reason your comment made on Sunday was treated as “spam,” and I didn’t catch it until just now….anyway, as you can see, yes, we will be doing weekly starter advice….While it’s a close call, we suggest going with Antonio Bryant over M. Jones for week 1.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robby</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-707</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-707</guid>
					<description>Glad to see we've come to a consensus here boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see we&#8217;ve come to a consensus here boys.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-706</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-706</guid>
					<description>Our bad.  I can't believe we forgot the Caddy.  I don't have him in my top 20, as I think he will be containted well by Baltimore in a game that should be very low scoring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our bad.  I can&#8217;t believe we forgot the Caddy.  I don&#8217;t have him in my top 20, as I think he will be containted well by Baltimore in a game that should be very low scoring.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robby</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-705</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-705</guid>
					<description>Whoops, big omission there - I'd put him at #8.  Sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, big omission there - I&#8217;d put him at #8.  Sorry
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-704</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-704</guid>
					<description>Bad oversight on our part Steve. Balt isn't a great matchup for Caddy, who was basically held out of the entire preaseason, so consider him in the #11-13 area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad oversight on our part Steve. Balt isn&#8217;t a great matchup for Caddy, who was basically held out of the entire preaseason, so consider him in the #11-13 area.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-703</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/07/week-1-rankings/#comment-703</guid>
					<description>Um, Carnell Williams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Carnell Williams?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
