<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movers and Shakers</title>
	<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-771</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-771</guid>
					<description>TV - Yes, your style is roto...here's an explanation of points style...

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/baseball/brules/brules-06.html

My vote is def. for roto non-H2H, baseball is a marathon sport, and you're just adding way more luck with H2H. Although I could see it being much more exciting during playoff time obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV - Yes, your style is roto&#8230;here&#8217;s an explanation of points style&#8230;</p>
<p><a href='http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/baseball/brules/brules-06.html' rel='nofollow'>http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/baseball/brules/brules-06.html</a></p>
<p>My vote is def. for roto non-H2H, baseball is a marathon sport, and you&#8217;re just adding way more luck with H2H. Although I could see it being much more exciting during playoff time obviously.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robby</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-770</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-770</guid>
					<description>I think we'll have to write an article about fantasy baseball formats (h2h v roto v points) because frankly I think all are flawed. . . coming soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ll have to write an article about fantasy baseball formats (h2h v roto v points) because frankly I think all are flawed. . . coming soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-769</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-769</guid>
					<description>If you think H2H baseball is ridiculous, why play it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think H2H baseball is ridiculous, why play it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-768</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-768</guid>
					<description>Love that teaser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love that teaser.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robby</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-767</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-767</guid>
					<description>I'm going to underestimate the 49ers again this week and tease the Eagles, probably with the Falcons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to underestimate the 49ers again this week and tease the Eagles, probably with the Falcons.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tv</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-766</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-766</guid>
					<description>What do you mean by h2h points league Nat?  I just got wiped out by my team of all stars essentially all deciding to have their worst game of the year.  We play head to head where you win categories by having the best in that category.  Is that points or roto?  For instance if you have a .292 avg and your opponent has a .256 for the week you win that category...seems like roto to me but you never know :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by h2h points league Nat?  I just got wiped out by my team of all stars essentially all deciding to have their worst game of the year.  We play head to head where you win categories by having the best in that category.  Is that points or roto?  For instance if you have a .292 avg and your opponent has a .256 for the week you win that category&#8230;seems like roto to me but you never know <img src='http://rotoscoop.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-765</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-765</guid>
					<description>I'll bet you any amount of $ Robby and take the 49ers...Then again, 49ers will def. be favored so that doesn't make any sense, but I want to state now that I don't think they will have any problem with Oak. Don't underestimate the 9ers at home, they even played tough their last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet you any amount of $ Robby and take the 49ers&#8230;Then again, 49ers will def. be favored so that doesn&#8217;t make any sense, but I want to state now that I don&#8217;t think they will have any problem with Oak. Don&#8217;t underestimate the 9ers at home, they even played tough their last year.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robby</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-764</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-764</guid>
					<description>Ya, head to head points is probably a good way to go. . .

I still think that Oakland is better than Tennessee and could easily beat the 9ers in a couple weeks.  I'm going with 3-13.

Ward for Moss is tough.  I'd stick with Moss based on upside but its definitely close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, head to head points is probably a good way to go. . .</p>
<p>I still think that Oakland is better than Tennessee and could easily beat the 9ers in a couple weeks.  I&#8217;m going with 3-13.</p>
<p>Ward for Moss is tough.  I&#8217;d stick with Moss based on upside but its definitely close.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-763</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-763</guid>
					<description>I may have read that wrong Randy, would you be the one getting Moss? If so, then I say do it, albeit not without some trepidation. Plus, you share his first name, always a nice bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have read that wrong Randy, would you be the one getting Moss? If so, then I say do it, albeit not without some trepidation. Plus, you share his first name, always a nice bonus.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-762</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-762</guid>
					<description>I was going to say age comes too much into play here, but then realized Ward is only 1 year older...I personally wouldn't do it, Moss' 38 touchdowns over the last three years are hard to ignore....With that said, I wouldn't blame you for doing so and am not recommending you don't because that Raider situation really does look hopeless right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say age comes too much into play here, but then realized Ward is only 1 year older&#8230;I personally wouldn&#8217;t do it, Moss&#8217; 38 touchdowns over the last three years are hard to ignore&#8230;.With that said, I wouldn&#8217;t blame you for doing so and am not recommending you don&#8217;t because that Raider situation really does look hopeless right now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: randy</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-761</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-761</guid>
					<description>another thought for keeper, h.ward for r. moss-------------any thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another thought for keeper, h.ward for r. moss&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-any thoughts
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-760</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-760</guid>
					<description>Is Oakland seriously going to go 0-16? Obviously odds are no, but I think it could happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Oakland seriously going to go 0-16? Obviously odds are no, but I think it could happen.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nat</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-758</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/09/18/movers-and-shakers/#comment-758</guid>
					<description>Head to head fantasy baseball is ridiculous if you're playing roto.  But if you're in a points league, it's ridiculous not to have head to head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Head to head fantasy baseball is ridiculous if you&#8217;re playing roto.  But if you&#8217;re in a points league, it&#8217;s ridiculous not to have head to head.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
