<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coaching Strategies</title>
	<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Keith</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1297</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1297</guid>
					<description>Robinson's run on 3rd down is a whole seperate issue...if he just angles off to the left a little bit, or actually just makes a quick cut towards the outside, the whole thing is a non-issue.  I think Gore would have been in there if he wasn't hurt, and I have a hard time getting mad at a rookie converted QB who runs hard all the time (though not intelligently)...but it was really the call that irked me the most. Heck, to gain 1&quot;, you don't have to be a good running QB, or a good anything for that matter...it's just a quick snap and lunge. It's a little tougher since it's loud on the road, but I think in this league, you have to go for the kill...and if you don't think you can get 1&quot; at a critical point in a game, you probably don't belong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robinson&#8217;s run on 3rd down is a whole seperate issue&#8230;if he just angles off to the left a little bit, or actually just makes a quick cut towards the outside, the whole thing is a non-issue.  I think Gore would have been in there if he wasn&#8217;t hurt, and I have a hard time getting mad at a rookie converted QB who runs hard all the time (though not intelligently)&#8230;but it was really the call that irked me the most. Heck, to gain 1&#8243;, you don&#8217;t have to be a good running QB, or a good anything for that matter&#8230;it&#8217;s just a quick snap and lunge. It&#8217;s a little tougher since it&#8217;s loud on the road, but I think in this league, you have to go for the kill&#8230;and if you don&#8217;t think you can get 1&#8243; at a critical point in a game, you probably don&#8217;t belong.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1296</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1296</guid>
					<description>The 49ers definitely blew it yesterday. Especially since A. Smith is a pretty good runner, it seems especially likely he could get the inch. Similarly, Gore needs to be able to stay on the field b/c M. Robinson isn't getting it done in short yardage situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 49ers definitely blew it yesterday. Especially since A. Smith is a pretty good runner, it seems especially likely he could get the inch. Similarly, Gore needs to be able to stay on the field b/c M. Robinson isn&#8217;t getting it done in short yardage situations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keith</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1295</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1295</guid>
					<description>You're a brilliant, brilliant man, Robby.

I'd also like to add that there's just a general lack of cajones among NFL coaches.  Some of it is in regards to bucking convention like some of these moves above, but a lot of it just seems to be more of a fear of failure and being second-guessed. There are so many chances on 4th downs for teams to really put their opponents away, and coaches just don't go for the jugular, and opt to play it safe.  I'm not advocating Mike Martz give coaching &quot;how to&quot; classes, but teams that leave the door open seem to end up with it slammed in their faces.  The 49ers game this past weekend was a prime example.  Mike Nolan has irked me to no end for being too conservative (I would have kicked the 52-yard field goal as well, rather than punting).  But with 4 minutes left, 4th down and maybe an inch to go...if a field goal puts you up two scores, I'm with you, kick it.  But really, what team can't pick up an inch on a QB sneak.  I wouldn't advocate handing off at all, so maybe if it's a couple feet to go, I'd kick the FG, but it was ONE INCH!  Even if you convert and still get a FG, just by running the ball 3-4 more times, you're going to take enough time off the clock to make a comeback impossible. Heck, even if you get stopped (by some absolute miracle), they are pinned very deep in their own territory...yeah, they would only need a field goal, but with the way teams have been pressuring Bulger, a safety is a very real possibility.  Bottom line, I think it was a weak call, and typical of most insecure coaches these days.

Since I do agree with your list Robby, let me add one of mine.  QB's calling time outs on 1st and 10's with the play clock winding down...especially late in halves of close games.  If it's 3rd and 1, I understand, but having time outs at the end of halves or games can be an absolutely huge difference maker.  HUGE.  Teams treat 5 yards on 1st or 2nd down like they're absolutely critical.  While by no means insignificant, facing an occassional 1st and 15 I would think is much preferable rather than having to drive the field at the end of a game with one less time out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a brilliant, brilliant man, Robby.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to add that there&#8217;s just a general lack of cajones among NFL coaches.  Some of it is in regards to bucking convention like some of these moves above, but a lot of it just seems to be more of a fear of failure and being second-guessed. There are so many chances on 4th downs for teams to really put their opponents away, and coaches just don&#8217;t go for the jugular, and opt to play it safe.  I&#8217;m not advocating Mike Martz give coaching &#8220;how to&#8221; classes, but teams that leave the door open seem to end up with it slammed in their faces.  The 49ers game this past weekend was a prime example.  Mike Nolan has irked me to no end for being too conservative (I would have kicked the 52-yard field goal as well, rather than punting).  But with 4 minutes left, 4th down and maybe an inch to go&#8230;if a field goal puts you up two scores, I&#8217;m with you, kick it.  But really, what team can&#8217;t pick up an inch on a QB sneak.  I wouldn&#8217;t advocate handing off at all, so maybe if it&#8217;s a couple feet to go, I&#8217;d kick the FG, but it was ONE INCH!  Even if you convert and still get a FG, just by running the ball 3-4 more times, you&#8217;re going to take enough time off the clock to make a comeback impossible. Heck, even if you get stopped (by some absolute miracle), they are pinned very deep in their own territory&#8230;yeah, they would only need a field goal, but with the way teams have been pressuring Bulger, a safety is a very real possibility.  Bottom line, I think it was a weak call, and typical of most insecure coaches these days.</p>
<p>Since I do agree with your list Robby, let me add one of mine.  QB&#8217;s calling time outs on 1st and 10&#8217;s with the play clock winding down&#8230;especially late in halves of close games.  If it&#8217;s 3rd and 1, I understand, but having time outs at the end of halves or games can be an absolutely huge difference maker.  HUGE.  Teams treat 5 yards on 1st or 2nd down like they&#8217;re absolutely critical.  While by no means insignificant, facing an occassional 1st and 15 I would think is much preferable rather than having to drive the field at the end of a game with one less time out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Holmgren</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1293</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1293</guid>
					<description>Hey Robby, you are the second coming of Jesus Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robby, you are the second coming of Jesus Christ.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robby</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1292</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1292</guid>
					<description>Thanks guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1291</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1291</guid>
					<description>Hey Robby this is the best article ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robby this is the best article ever!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marty Schottenheimer</title>
		<link>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1288</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/11/22/coaching-strategies/#comment-1288</guid>
					<description>Just because we didn't comment, doesn't mean we don't love you and all the hard work you do, Robby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because we didn&#8217;t comment, doesn&#8217;t mean we don&#8217;t love you and all the hard work you do, Robby.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
