Take the Padres
By Dalton Del Don – Senior Writer
As a gambling addict, the recent banning of online gaming within the states has taken a major toll on my personal life. My pocket book, ironically, is typically a little thicker, however. Still, a recent trip found me in Reno, Nevada and inevitably streaking to the sportsbook. With football season finished (sorry, I’m not quite at a degenerate level ready to bet on the Pro Bowl), I mostly browsed futures bets. With the Dallas Mavericks and Phoenix Suns a little too heavily favored (5/2), I moved along seeking more of a long-shot wager with a potential increased payout. I headed to baseball.
To my surprise, I didn’t agree with many of the posted odds to win this year’s World Series. The Blue Jays at 15-1? I wouldn’t take that bet even if it was for them to finish second in the AL East. Nine teams fell in the 10-1 or lower odds range, including the Cubs (9-1?!). I like what the Braves did to their bullpen over the offseason, so their 30-1 mark was interesting, but the Padres listed at the same 30-1 long shot really caught my eye. Listen, I’m a Giants fan and will be rooting for them this season, but they have no business being favored (10-1) by this much over San Diego. I walked into the casino thinking San Diego as the clear NL West favorites, but apparently, the bookmakers disagreed.
Really, 30-1? This is the same team that won their division back-to-back seasons right? Am I mistaken, or does the rotation not feature Jake Peavy, Chris Young, Greg Maddux, Clay Hensley and David Wells? The bullpen, by the way, consists of Trevor Hoffman, Scott Linebrink and Cla Meredith. They did lose Mike Piazza, Dave Roberts and Josh Barfield but countered with the additions of Kevin Kouzmanoff and Marcus Giles. Terrmel Sledge and Josh Bard arguably are upgrades anyway.
It’s true, San Diego is missing a premiere bat in the heart of the order, but still, Khalil Greene is a breakout candidate (like every year over the past few seasons), and Brian Giles, Mike Cameron and Adrian Gonzalez round out a solid lineup without a glaring weakness. On the surface, Bud Black seems like a more than competent new manager, and let’s not forget, 85-88 wins are usually enough to win the pathetic NL West. The Padres aren’t my World Series favorites, but since they have one of the easiest paths to the playoffs, I would clump them in the top 5-8 range. At 30-1, there isn’t a better futures bet out there. Take the Fathers.
February 11th, 2007 at 1:56 pm
How do I reach you guys to discuss swapping links? Or better yet, each mentioning eachother’s blogs in a post?
February 11th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
Alex - I e-mailed you.
February 11th, 2007 at 10:53 pm
I agree; SD has the pitching to at least have a shot and at those odds, might as well take them. Remember entering last postseason when everyone picked them to easily beat St Louis round 1? Now they are afterthoughts?….That said, LA is going to win the NL West!
February 11th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Marvin Harrison 5, Mary J 4
February 12th, 2007 at 8:19 am
I’m glad to hear that the odds are good enough for you to find space in your sporting heart to root for my Padres, but since you are a SF fan, I have a question for you: Who is going to close for the Giants? I’m in the final rounds of a slow draft and I wouldn’t mind taking a flyer on a saves canidate in case Benitez is traded or balloons up to 300 pounds. Any thoughts?
February 12th, 2007 at 9:46 am
Brian Wilson.
February 12th, 2007 at 9:51 am
Mr Tintle - That’s right, one of the few prop bets I got right.
February 12th, 2007 at 9:53 am
djpegleg - You have the right idea not trusting Benitez; in fact, he showed up to camp early (which is nice) but again overweight (tough to work out with 2 bum knees). Other than Brian Wilson (the best alternative at this point) SF may turn to Vinny Chulk (blah) or even Tim Lincecum - the kid is almost ready and if there isn’t a rotation spot, he could be moved to the bullpen and excel immediately. I’d take a flier on Wilson and/or Lincecum.
February 13th, 2007 at 8:32 am
thanks. I’ll take your advice.
February 13th, 2007 at 11:21 am
Lincecum looks like the real deal; I’m looking for him in any keeper leagues I play in, and Matt Cain too…I’m kicking myself for keeping Verlander and trading Cain instead of vice versa.
February 13th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
Ya man, I’d prefer Cain over Verlander as well….Lincecum is going to be a stud.
July 23rd, 2007 at 12:06 pm
This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title Take the Padres. Thanks for informative article