The Bonds Quandary

By Robby Wellington – Staff Writer

Don’t worry, I’m not going to beat a dead horse here, although I will quickly say two things. First, all things being equal, if he had never taken steroids, Bonds would still have a ton of home runs, maybe 50-70 fewer than he does now (as opposed to the 150-200 fewer that most people seem to be projecting), and he would still be the greatest player of the past 15 years. Second, Babe Ruth was far and away the most dominant player the game will ever see. However, if he were to step out of a time machine and play today, he would be nothing more than a marginal starter. Moving on, the real question I’m trying to address here is what sort of fantasy production should we expect from here on out from Barry, and what sort of league formats does he provide the most value in?

Let’s address the production question first. Now I know that Bonds has been struggling all season long and that the weight of catching the Babe is allegedly taking a toll on his body and mind. But I also know that he went yard virtually every at-bat in spring training and can certainly get hot in a hurry. I see Bonds finishing the season with somewhere around 135 games played (although 20 of those will be as a pinch hitter), and a statline of .290, 35, 80 with 100 runs scored and a healthy 1.100 OPS. Basically, pretty respectable numbers (especially considering his tepid start) but nowhere near the gaudy stats he put up before 2005. Let’s conservatively call him the 25th most valuable outfielder in fantasy baseball right now in a 5X5, daily transaction roto league.

I specify league format because Bonds’ value is largely contingent upon it, more so than almost any other player. If your league includes OPS, Ks or walks as offensive categories then Bonds moves up a couple of spots (more than a couple for walks) in overall outfield rankings. Bonds also possesses significantly more value in daily transaction leagues, as he sits every fourth game or so. While weekly transaction managers are forced to eat those DNPs, those making daily transactions not only have the luxury of sitting him, but also, thanks to the media scrutiny surrounding the home run chase, of almost always knowing when he isn’t going to play. Lastly, Bonds’ value takes a hit in head-to-head leagues, where the last few weeks of the season are by far the most critical, and there is a good chance that Bonds won’t be playing then, especially if the Giants fall out of the postseason race. If you’re like me and have him in a head-to-head league, see what you can get for him once he goes on a home run tear. . . which should be happening any day now, right Barry?


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

19 responses to “The Bonds Quandary”

  1. Matt Avatar
    Matt

    It’s possible Bonds plays in even more games than that. How long is this drought going to last? Come on, I want a prediction on when he’s going to break this thing??

  2. Robby Avatar
    Robby

    May 25th, 2006. You heard it here first, at rotoscoop.com!

  3. Tim Avatar
    Tim

    The thing thats killin me about Bonds is I have a 162 MAX game cap and he always counts as a GP even on his off-days b/c of the ONE pinch hit at bat.

  4. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Greatest player of last 15 years? Try greatest hitter of all time!!

  5. Jon B Avatar
    Jon B

    I think the point of Mr. Ruth being a marginal player today is key and is oft understated. I talked about this with a friend recently: with latino/african american players excluded during that time, the league had plenty of pitchers who very well should have not been in the majors. What happens when expansion teams join the league? Stat explosions by the true G’s of the game killing pithcers/hitters who just shouldnt be on the same field. Not that Ruth wasn’t dominant, but it ceraintly can be qualified. And I think Barry rips it in St Louis next week, and turns it on once Moises “True O’ g” Alou comes back.

  6. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    Exactly Jon B., the fact Ruth played only against white people should not be underestimated. I am also forced to concur that Moises Alou is a “true OG.”

  7. Robby Avatar
    Robby

    Minorities notwithstanding, I think its primarily a time issue. If Bonds from the early 2000s were to travel 90 years into the future, I’d be surprised if he were even an allstar – OFs are going to be benching 800 pounds and running 3.8 40s in 2100. And baseball is the only sport of the big three where comparing players from different eras is even remotely applicable. Joe Namath’s Jets would be 30-point underdogs to the Houston Texans (and probably 15-point underdogs to last year’s USC) and George Mikan’s Minneapolis Lakers would easily be the worst team in D-1 college basketball today.

  8. Jon B Avatar
    Jon B

    Time is key. Maybe we’re seeing the next generation embodied in Mr. Pujols?!?!

  9. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    I agree w/ your time assessment Robby. And Pujols is def. an example of this….And comparing numbers again will not really work because they may not be that much bigger either, b/c pitchers are going to be throwing 110 then.

  10. Giovanna Avatar

    O ionikos exei to svemsao gia istoria kai opadous toy. Kai kalos na erthete paidia. Alla mhn perimenete tourismo. Tha fwnaksoume,tha brisoume kai oti xriastei gia na sthriksoume Panaxa k na xasete file

  11. … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  12. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  13. … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  14. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  15. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  16. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  17. … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 83137 more Information to that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  18. … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

  19. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: rotoscoop.com/2006/05/the-bonds-quandary/ […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *